N※N

House increases security funding ahead of members'' return to their home districts after attack on Minnesota lawmakers | CNN Politics

House Boosts Security Funding for Members Amid Rising Threats

Washington (CNN) — In a significant move reflecting the escalating concerns over political violence and harassment, the US House of Representatives has approved a substantial increase in security funding for its members. The decision, announced on Tuesday, comes as lawmakers grapple with a surge in threats that have intensified in recent years, prompting bipartisan calls for enhanced protections. This latest allocation underscores the growing recognition that the safety of elected officials is paramount to the functioning of American democracy, even as it raises questions about the balance between security and public accessibility.

The House Administration Committee, led by Chairman Bryan Steil, a Republican from Wisconsin, spearheaded the initiative. According to committee sources, the new funding package will provide an additional $10 million for member security details, including reimbursements for personal protection services, home security upgrades, and travel escorts. This builds on existing programs managed by the US Capitol Police (USCP), which already oversee security for congressional members both on and off Capitol Hill. The increase is set to take effect immediately, with funds drawn from the House's operational budget, avoiding the need for a separate appropriations bill that could face delays in the divided Congress.

The impetus for this enhancement stems from a disturbing uptick in threats against lawmakers. Data from the USCP indicates that reported threats against members of Congress have more than doubled since 2020, with over 9,000 incidents logged in the past year alone. These range from online harassment and doxxing to more severe cases involving stalking and assassination attempts. Just last month, a Democratic representative from California reported receiving death threats following a contentious vote on immigration reform, while a Republican from Texas faced similar intimidation after criticizing far-right elements within his party. These incidents are not isolated; they reflect a broader pattern of polarization that has seeped into the personal lives of public servants.

House Speaker Mike Johnson, a Republican from Louisiana, praised the measure in a statement, emphasizing its necessity in an era of heightened political tension. "Our members serve the American people with dedication, but they should not have to fear for their safety or that of their families," Johnson said. "This funding ensures that those who threaten our democracy face consequences, while allowing our representatives to focus on the work at hand." On the other side of the aisle, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, a Democrat from New York, echoed these sentiments, calling the increase a "critical step" but urging further action to address the root causes of such threats, including misinformation and extremist rhetoric amplified on social media platforms.

The decision arrives against the backdrop of several high-profile events that have shaken the political landscape. The January 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol remains a stark reminder of the vulnerabilities faced by lawmakers, with many still dealing with the psychological aftermath. More recently, the attempted assassination of former President Donald Trump at a rally in Pennsylvania earlier this year has reignited debates about political security nationwide. In response, the Secret Service has expanded its protective details for presidential candidates, but congressional members have often felt underserved by comparison. "We're not asking for VIP treatment," one anonymous House member told CNN. "We're asking for the basics to do our jobs without looking over our shoulders."

Experts in political security and extremism have weighed in on the implications of this funding boost. Brian Levin, director of the Center for the Study of Hate and Extremism at California State University, San Bernardino, described the move as "long overdue" but cautioned that it addresses symptoms rather than causes. "Threats against elected officials are a barometer of societal unrest," Levin explained. "While increased security is essential, we must also tackle the underlying issues like online radicalization and the erosion of civil discourse." He pointed to studies showing that a significant portion of threats originate from domestic extremists, often fueled by conspiracy theories propagated on platforms like X (formerly Twitter) and Telegram.

The funding will specifically target several key areas. First, it expands the Member Security Program, which reimburses lawmakers for expenses related to personal security. This could include hiring private bodyguards for events in their districts or installing advanced home surveillance systems. Second, it bolsters the USCP's threat assessment capabilities, allowing for more proactive monitoring of potential risks through enhanced intelligence sharing with federal agencies like the FBI and DHS. Third, the package includes provisions for mental health support for members and their staff, acknowledging the toll that constant threats can take on well-being.

Critics, however, argue that the measures could inadvertently create a fortress mentality in Congress, distancing representatives from their constituents. "Security is important, but so is accessibility," said Sarah Longwell, a Republican strategist and founder of the Republican Accountability Project. "If lawmakers are bunkered down with guards, it might exacerbate the perception that they're out of touch." Some progressive voices have also raised concerns about equity, noting that members from urban districts or those representing minority communities often face disproportionate threats, yet the funding distribution might not fully account for these disparities.

Historically, congressional security has evolved in response to crises. After the 1954 shooting in the House chamber by Puerto Rican nationalists, which injured five members, security protocols were tightened. The 1983 bombing of the Capitol by leftist radicals further prompted upgrades. Post-9/11, the creation of the Department of Homeland Security integrated congressional protection into broader national efforts. The 2021 Capitol riot led to the installation of permanent fencing and an increase in USCP personnel, though much of that has since been scaled back amid public outcry over aesthetics and symbolism.

In the current climate, with the 2026 midterm elections on the horizon, the security enhancements could play a role in candidate recruitment and retention. Several lawmakers have cited safety concerns as reasons for retiring or declining to run again. For instance, Rep. Annie Kuster, a Democrat from New Hampshire, announced her retirement last year, partially attributing it to the "toxic" environment. Political analysts suggest that without robust protections, the pool of willing public servants could shrink, potentially leading to a Congress dominated by those with greater personal resources or tolerance for risk.

The bipartisan support for this funding—passing the committee on a voice vote with no objections—signals a rare moment of unity in a polarized House. Yet, it also highlights the fragility of democratic institutions when threats become normalized. As one senior aide put it, "This isn't just about protecting bodies; it's about safeguarding the soul of our representative government."

Looking ahead, the Senate is considering similar measures, with Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer indicating openness to mirroring the House's actions. Meanwhile, advocacy groups like the Brennan Center for Justice are pushing for comprehensive reforms, including stricter regulations on online threats and better coordination between local law enforcement and federal protectors.

In essence, this security boost represents a pragmatic response to an alarming trend, but it also serves as a sobering commentary on the state of American politics. As threats evolve with technology and social dynamics, so too must the defenses that preserve the integrity of public service. Lawmakers hope that these steps will deter would-be aggressors and allow them to fulfill their duties without fear, ensuring that the halls of Congress remain a bastion of debate rather than danger.

The full impact of these changes will likely unfold over the coming months, as members navigate an increasingly volatile landscape. For now, the message from the House is clear: safety is non-negotiable in the pursuit of democracy.

Read the Full CNN Article at:
[ https://www.cnn.com/2025/07/22/politics/house-increases-member-security ]