N※N

Advocates for the disabled, poor, public health criticize proposed changes to anti-bullying law

  //health-fitness.news-articles.net/content/2025/ .. icize-proposed-changes-to-anti-bullying-law.html
  Published in Health and Fitness on Wednesday, November 5th 2025 at 19:33 GMT by New Hampshire Union Leader

• 🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication
• 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source

2025-11-05 179 x 224 / 16119 Bytes

2025-11-05 245 x 206 / 8673 Bytes

2025-11-05 224 x 224 / 12495 Bytes

2025-11-05 179 x 224 / 14475 Bytes

New Hampshire Advocates Protest Proposed Weakening of Anti‑Bullying Law

A coalition of disability rights groups, low‑income student advocates and public‑health professionals has publicly condemned a new legislative package that would revise New Hampshire’s anti‑bullying law, arguing that the changes would erode protections for some of the state’s most vulnerable students. The proposals, introduced in the House and slated for debate next month, would alter how schools define and respond to bullying, potentially shifting responsibility away from public‑school districts and reducing penalties for non‑compliance.

The current law, enacted in 2012, required every district to adopt a written bullying‑prevention policy, to train staff, and to establish a reporting system for incidents of harassment, intimidation, or physical aggression. Under the statute, a district that failed to meet these requirements could face a loss of state funds and a requirement to submit corrective plans. The law also mandated that schools notify parents within 48 hours of a reported incident and required school‑wide “anti‑bullying” assemblies every six months.

House Republicans, led by Rep. Matthew Timmons, argue that the law’s language is overly broad and creates “administrative burdens” for schools that already wrestle with limited staffing and budget constraints. The bill (HB 1453) proposes a narrower definition of bullying that excludes certain non‑violent or non‑intentional acts, such as teasing or social exclusion that does not result in a measurable psychological impact. It also eliminates the mandatory reporting requirement and replaces it with a “voluntary” notification system that would give schools discretion over when and how to inform parents.

The House Education Committee released a summary of the bill, noting that “the amendments will encourage schools to focus on preventative measures rather than punitive enforcement.” The committee’s spokesperson said the changes would “align the state law with best practices observed in other states that have successfully reduced bullying rates.”

Critics counter that the revisions strip essential accountability measures from the law. The Disability Rights Advocacy Alliance (DRAA) issued a statement calling the bill “a step backward for students with disabilities who are disproportionately targeted by bullying.” DRAA president Maya Gonzalez emphasized that students with autism, ADHD, and other learning differences often experience bullying that is dismissed as “tolerance” under the proposed definition. “The proposed changes would essentially hand school districts the power to decide what constitutes bullying, allowing them to overlook serious incidents that harm vulnerable students,” Gonzalez said.

The Low‑Income Students Coalition (LISC), which works with students from economically disadvantaged households, also opposed the bill. “Bullying is not just about physical aggression; it often involves exclusion from peer activities that can affect academic performance,” said LISC co‑founder Kevin Patel. “Removing the mandatory reporting requirement gives schools the chance to ignore incidents that can have a cascading effect on low‑income students’ mental health and academic success.”

Public‑health experts added another layer of concern. Dr. Susan Lee, a pediatrician who works with the New Hampshire Department of Health & Human Services, warned that the changes could exacerbate the mental‑health crisis among teens. “Bullying has been linked to depression, anxiety, and increased risk of suicide,” Lee said. “The removal of strict reporting protocols and enforcement measures could lead to under‑reporting and under‑intervention, creating a dangerous environment for children.”

In addition to the lobbying efforts, the article cites a petition circulating among parents and educators that has garnered over 4,000 signatures urging the House to revise the bill. The petition, hosted on Change.org, calls for “a return to mandatory reporting and accountability measures that protect every student, regardless of ability or socioeconomic status.”

House Republicans have invited members of the public to comment on the bill during a series of town‑hall meetings scheduled for next month. The Education Committee’s meeting is set for October 12, where the bill’s language will be debated in detail. The DRAA, LISC and the New Hampshire Public Health Association plan to attend and provide testimony in support of the current law.

For those wishing to examine the full text of HB 1453, it is available on the New Hampshire General Court’s website under “Legislative Bills & Resolutions.” The bill’s summary, including the exact language proposed for redefining bullying and altering reporting requirements, can be downloaded from the “Legislative Documents” section. Additionally, the New Hampshire Department of Education’s website hosts the current anti‑bullying policy guidelines, which the bill seeks to modify; these guidelines are available at “nh.gov/education/anti-bullying.”

The debate over HB 1453 underscores a broader national conversation about how best to protect students from harassment while balancing the administrative realities faced by schools. As the House moves forward, the outcome will likely shape the everyday safety and mental‑health environment for thousands of New Hampshire students.