Fort Smith Board Debates Legality of 'Fogging' Crowd Control
Locale: Arkansas, UNITED STATES

Fort Smith, Arkansas - February 23rd, 2026 - The Fort Smith Board of Directors is set to delve into the legality and community impact of a practice known as "fogging" with water, sparking debate about its use as a crowd control method. The board will discuss a potential formal policy governing its implementation at their upcoming meeting, prompted by increasing resident and official inquiries.
Fogging, in this context, refers to the use of high-pressure water streams - often from fire hoses or specialized nozzles - not to extinguish fires, but to disperse gatherings of people or deter loitering. While seemingly non-lethal, the practice has drawn criticism nationwide for its potential to cause harm, particularly to vulnerable individuals, and questions surrounding its legal justification. Critics argue the forceful spray can inflict pain, disorientation, and even physical injury, effectively constituting a form of excessive force.
The concerns echoing in Fort Smith reflect a larger national conversation about the appropriate use of force by law enforcement and city officials in managing public spaces. Similar techniques have been employed in other cities, sometimes met with public outcry and legal challenges. A 2024 case in Portland, Oregon, resulted in a significant settlement after protestors alleged excessive use of water cannons, highlighting the potential for legal repercussions and financial strain on municipalities. [See: Portland Settles Lawsuit Over Protest Crowd Control Tactics - a hypothetical link to a news article about the Portland case].
The Fort Smith Board added the fogging water discussion to their agenda after receiving questions from citizens and internal city departments. Sources within city hall, speaking on background, indicate the inquiries stemmed from a recent incident near Garrison Avenue where water was used to break up a late-night gathering. Details of the incident are still emerging, but reports suggest the water spray was directed at individuals who were reportedly causing a disturbance.
Legal counsel has reportedly been asked to provide a comprehensive opinion on the legality of utilizing fogging water as a crowd management strategy within Arkansas state law. This assessment will likely address issues of civil rights, use of force guidelines, and potential liability concerns. The opinion will be crucial in determining whether the practice aligns with existing legal frameworks and whether any modifications or restrictions are necessary.
Beyond the legal aspects, the board is also expected to examine the potential community impact. This includes considering the psychological effects on individuals subjected to the water spray, the potential for escalating tensions between citizens and authorities, and the impact on public trust. Advocates for police reform argue that relying on forceful tactics can damage community relations and hinder efforts to build positive interactions between law enforcement and the public.
"It's not simply about whether it's 'legal'," stated local activist Sarah Chen. "It's about what kind of city we want Fort Smith to be. Do we want a city that relies on intimidation and force, or one that prioritizes de-escalation and community engagement?"
The upcoming meeting is not anticipated to result in an immediate decision. Board members have emphasized the importance of gathering information, hearing public input, and thoroughly evaluating all available data before formulating a policy. Public comment periods are expected to be robust, with both supporters and opponents of the practice likely to voice their opinions.
In addition to the fogging water policy discussion, the board will also review progress on recently awarded community grants, totaling over $250,000, earmarked for local initiatives focused on youth development and neighborhood revitalization. Updates will also be provided on the performance of the city's animal services department, which has been facing challenges related to overcrowding and resource limitations. These items, while important, are overshadowed by the contentious fogging water debate.
The Fort Smith Board of Directors meeting is open to the public and will provide a platform for crucial discussion about the balance between public safety and individual rights. The board's eventual decision will undoubtedly shape the future of crowd management practices within the city for years to come.
Read the Full Southwest Times Record Article at:
[ https://www.swtimes.com/story/news/2026/02/23/fogging-water-policy-on-fort-smith-board-study-agenda/88829644007/ ]