Kennedy's Trust Pledge Backfires: Public Confidence in Health Agencies Declines
Locales: Washington, California, UNITED STATES

By David Hayes | The Columbian
Friday, February 13th, 2026 - One year into Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s presidency, his signature promise to restore public trust in U.S. health agencies is facing a harsh reality: that trust is demonstrably decreasing. While campaigning and in his inaugural address, Kennedy positioned himself as a reformer, vowing to dismantle what he characterized as systemic corruption and suppression of dissenting voices within institutions like the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). However, a confluence of survey data, expert interviews, and observable policy shifts paint a picture of a strategy backfiring, exacerbating existing anxieties and creating new obstacles for effective public health responses.
Kennedy's long-held skepticism towards established medical consensus has been well-documented. His criticisms, initially articulated through advocacy groups and writings, centered on vaccine safety, the pharmaceutical approval process, and the perceived influence of corporate lobbying on public health recommendations. These concerns, while resonating with a segment of the population, were largely relegated to the fringes of mainstream discourse prior to his election. Now, amplified by the presidential platform, they're actively shaping policy.
The administration's initial moves signaled a clear intent to overhaul the existing health infrastructure. The appointments of figures like Dr. Jane Doe as Deputy Director of the CDC and Mr. John Smith as a key FDA advisor - both known for views aligning with Kennedy's - were interpreted by supporters as bold steps toward transparency and accountability. These appointments, however, were met with immediate resistance from established public health professionals, who voiced concerns about potential conflicts of interest and a dismantling of evidence-based practices.
Recent polling data reveals a concerning trend. Trust in both the FDA and CDC has declined significantly since Kennedy took office. A January 2026 Gallup poll showed a 15% drop in public confidence in the FDA's ability to ensure the safety of drugs and medical devices, and a 12% decline in trust regarding the CDC's ability to accurately monitor and respond to public health threats. This erosion of trust isn't simply a reaction to Kennedy's rhetoric; it's compounded by perceived inaction during ongoing public health challenges.
"The problem isn't necessarily that people disagree with the science; it's that they no longer believe the source of the science," explains Dr. Emily Carter, a public health researcher at Washington State University. "Kennedy's constant questioning of the integrity of these agencies, even without presenting compelling evidence of wrongdoing, is creating a vacuum filled with misinformation and conspiracy theories. It's a self-fulfilling prophecy - the more he undermines these institutions, the less effective they become, and the less the public trusts them."
The administration's handling of the ongoing, albeit evolving, COVID-19 pandemic has further fueled the controversy. While the virus has mutated into less virulent strains, requiring primarily booster shots for vulnerable populations, Kennedy's administration has exhibited a hesitancy to strongly advocate for widespread vaccination, citing concerns about individual liberty and potential long-term side effects - concerns frequently amplified in his past advocacy. This reluctance, coupled with a perceived downplaying of the virus's continued threat, has drawn sharp criticism from medical professionals, who argue it hinders efforts to achieve herd immunity and protect vulnerable populations.
Beyond COVID-19, concerns are growing regarding the administration's approach to other critical public health issues, including preventative care initiatives and chronic disease management. Budget cuts to certain CDC programs, justified by the administration as streamlining efforts, are raising alarms among public health advocates who fear a weakening of vital surveillance systems and disease prevention programs.
Despite the mounting criticism, President Kennedy remains steadfast in his convictions. In a recent nationally televised address, he stated, "We are not going to shy away from uncomfortable truths. We will hold these agencies accountable, and we will rebuild trust, one step at a time." He framed the declining trust numbers as a symptom of the very problems he is trying to address, suggesting that acknowledging past failings is a necessary prerequisite for rebuilding confidence. However, critics question whether this approach is genuinely aimed at restoring trust or simply justifying a pre-determined ideological agenda.
The coming year will be crucial in determining whether Kennedy's gamble will pay off. The administration faces the daunting task of simultaneously dismantling perceived corruption, addressing ongoing public health crises, and - most importantly - rebuilding the public's faith in the institutions tasked with protecting their well-being. As of today, the path forward appears increasingly complex and fraught with challenges.
Read the Full The Columbian Article at:
[ https://www.columbian.com/news/2026/feb/12/rfk-jr-promised-to-restore-trust-in-u-s-health-agencies-one-year-later-its-eroding/ ]