Fri, February 13, 2026
Thu, February 12, 2026

California Considers Defining 'Craft Spirits'

Sacramento, CA - February 12th, 2026 - A pivotal piece of legislation is currently making its way through the California State Assembly, poised to redefine the landscape of the burgeoning craft spirits industry. Assembly Bill 1898, sponsored by Assemblymember Jesse Petrea, aims to establish the first formal definition of "craft distilled spirit" within the state, addressing growing concerns about transparency and authenticity in a market increasingly dominated by larger corporations.

For years, the term "craft" has been used with increasing frequency in the spirits world, mirroring the success of the craft beer and wine movements. Consumers, increasingly seeking unique, locally-produced, and high-quality beverages, have driven demand for products marketed as 'craft'. However, unlike beer and wine which have relatively well-established definitions and regulatory frameworks for labeling and production, the spirits industry has largely operated without a standardized meaning for the term. This lack of regulation has opened the door for deceptive marketing practices, allowing large, established spirits producers to brand products as "craft" despite being manufactured on a mass scale, potentially misleading consumers.

The core of AB 1898 proposes specific parameters that spirits must meet to earn the "craft distilled spirit" designation. Currently under consideration are limitations on annual production volume, a cap on alcohol content (proof), and stringent labeling requirements detailing the entire production process - from grain sourcing to bottling. While the specific thresholds are still being debated within the Assembly Committee on Agriculture and Water, the intention is clear: to differentiate genuinely small-batch, artisanal spirits from those merely marketed as such.

"Consumers deserve to know what they're buying," explains Assemblymember Petrea. "They want to support small businesses and authentic producers. This bill provides the clarity and transparency needed to ensure that the 'craft' label actually reflects the spirit's origin and the care taken in its production."

The implications of this bill extend far beyond simply clarifying a label. Advocates argue that a standardized definition of "craft" is crucial for safeguarding the reputation of California's thriving small-scale distilleries. Many of these distilleries are family-owned businesses deeply invested in their communities, using locally sourced ingredients and traditional distillation methods. Without clear standards, they risk being overshadowed by larger companies that can leverage marketing budgets to falsely portray themselves as artisanal.

However, the bill is not without its opposition. Established spirits producers, represented by the California Spirits Association, have voiced concerns that AB 1898 could stifle innovation and impose unnecessary burdens on the industry. They argue that a rigid definition of "craft" may hinder the growth of smaller distilleries striving to scale up and compete in a national market. Some also suggest that proof limitations could restrict the creation of certain types of spirits. A spokesperson for the association stated, "We believe the market should determine what constitutes 'craft,' not government regulation. Imposing arbitrary limits will only harm businesses and limit consumer choice."

The debate highlights a broader tension within the food and beverage industry: balancing consumer protection with the need for fostering innovation and economic growth. Other states, including Oregon and Washington, have begun to explore similar legislation, recognizing the need for greater transparency in the 'craft' beverage sector. Experts anticipate that the outcome of AB 1898 could set a precedent for other states considering similar regulations.

Beyond the legislative battleground, industry analysts predict that a clear "craft" definition in California could significantly impact the marketing strategies of spirits brands. Authenticity and transparency are becoming increasingly important to consumers, and companies that can demonstrate their commitment to these values are likely to gain a competitive advantage. The bill could also lead to the development of certification programs and independent auditing processes to verify compliance with the "craft" standards.

The Assembly Committee on Agriculture and Water is expected to hold hearings on AB 1898 throughout February, with a full Assembly vote anticipated in March. The bill's fate remains uncertain, but one thing is clear: the debate over the definition of "craft spirits" is far from over.


Read the Full San Francisco Chronicle Article at:
[ https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/bill-asks-california-craft-standard-213704504.html ]