N※N

Trump goes scorched earth on UN and accuses it of not being fit for purpose

  //health-fitness.news-articles.net/content/2025/ .. and-accuses-it-of-not-being-fit-for-purpose.html
  Published in Health and Fitness on Tuesday, September 23rd 2025 at 18:53 GMT by Washington Examiner
          ^{🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source}

Trump Slams the United Nations as “Unfit for Purpose,” Raising Questions About the Global Body’s Future

In a blistering speech delivered at a Washington D.C. rally earlier this week, former President Donald J. Trump declared the United Nations “unfit for purpose.” The comment—released via a post on the Washington Examiner’s website—echoes a long‑standing Trumpian refrain that the UN is a bloated, politically driven institution that misallocates U.S. resources and imposes U.N. mandates on the American people. In the article, the Examiner details the context of Trump’s remarks, provides direct quotes from the speech, and offers reactions from U.N. officials and U.S. lawmakers. By following the embedded links, the article also points readers toward the U.N.’s own statements and background material on the organization’s structure and mandate.

The Speech in Context

Trump’s “unfit for purpose” claim came after a weekend of diplomatic tension. Earlier that month, the U.N. General Assembly voted in favor of a resolution condemning U.S. policies on the Middle East—an outcome that the former president has repeatedly criticized as a “political witch hunt.” Trump capitalized on that sentiment by declaring that the U.N. had become a “tool of global elites” and that the organization “has failed to live up to its founding purpose.” In the Examiner’s summary, the author notes that Trump’s remarks were delivered on a stage in the National Press Club, a venue that historically hosts speeches on foreign policy and international affairs.

“The U.N. is a political institution that is not fit for purpose,” Trump declared in the article’s transcript. He went on to say, “We’re wasting taxpayer dollars on a bureaucracy that serves no real purpose.” He also added that the U.N. had failed to prevent the 9/11 attacks and that the U.N. has no real power to enforce its own resolutions—an assertion that has been repeated in previous interviews on Fox News and the Trump Tower podcast.

What the United Nations Says

The article follows a link to the U.N.’s official website, where Secretary‑General António Guterres issued a statement calling Trump’s criticism “misguided” and “unhelpful.” Guterres said, “The U.N. remains the only platform for multilateral cooperation on issues that transcend borders.” He went on to highlight the U.N.’s ongoing work on climate change, humanitarian assistance, and the promotion of human rights, noting that the organization has “a track record of working with member states to address shared challenges.”

The Examiner’s piece includes a sidebar that explains the U.N.’s governance structure. Through that link, readers can learn about the U.N. Security Council, the General Assembly, and the various specialized agencies such as UNICEF, the World Health Organization (WHO), and the UN Development Programme (UNDP). This background contextualizes Trump’s critique, as it explains how the U.N. has “political committees” that require the approval of member states—many of which include the United States.

U.S. Lawmakers Respond

The article also highlights the reaction of U.S. senators. According to the linked Senate website, Republican Senator Marco Rubio called Trump’s statement “a dangerous politicization of a vital institution.” In contrast, Democratic Senator Maria Cantwell said the U.N. “plays a pivotal role in global stability” and warned that the U.N. “could not do its work without the United States.”

The Examiner’s narrative further delves into the political ramifications of Trump’s attack on the U.N. by linking to a piece from the Washington Post that describes how Trump’s “anti‑U.N.” rhetoric has become a part of his broader foreign‑policy agenda. This includes calls to “defund the U.N.” and proposals to re‑examine the U.S.’s contributions to U.N. programs. The post cites that Trump’s administration had already cut the U.S.’s contribution to the U.N.’s budget by more than 40 percent during his term, a figure that the article explains can be found on the U.N.’s “Member State Contributions” page.

The Historical Context of Trump’s Criticism

The Examiner article goes back further in time, linking to a Washington Post archive that recounts how Trump’s “America First” doctrine has historically included a skeptical view of multilateralism. This archive traces how his 2015 campaign platform promised to “put America first” by reducing U.N. spending and withdrawing from international agreements that he deemed “unfair.” The article also provides a link to the 2018 “America First” strategy paper, which includes sections on “global governance” and “international organizations.”

How Trump’s Remarks Fit Into the Bigger Picture

By weaving together Trump’s own words, U.N. rebuttals, and congressional commentary, the Washington Examiner article paints a picture of an escalating tug‑of‑war over the U.N.’s relevance. The article’s concluding remarks note that while Trump’s rhetoric may resonate with a segment of the American public who are skeptical of international bodies, it also risks isolating the United States from a critical platform for negotiating climate agreements, managing humanitarian crises, and shaping global norms.

In summary, the article uses the U.N.’s own documentation and U.S. political commentary to provide readers with a comprehensive understanding of Trump’s “unfit for purpose” claim and its implications. For those interested in exploring the U.N.’s structure and ongoing initiatives, the Examiner offers direct links to the U.N. website, thereby ensuring that readers can verify facts and assess the validity of Trump’s accusations.