N※N

US state legislatures seek to destroy the public health apparatus

  //health-fitness.news-articles.net/content/2025/ .. seek-to-destroy-the-public-health-apparatus.html
  Published in Health and Fitness on Thursday, October 30th 2025 at 21:58 GMT by World Socialist Web Site
          ^{🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source}

2025-10-30 199 x 224 / 10811 Bytes

2025-10-30 286 x 176 / 19872 Bytes

2025-10-26 224 x 224 / 6162 Bytes

2025-10-30 312 x 89 / 11395 Bytes

The New Space Race: Capitalism, Imperialism, and the Promise of “Voyager”

The World Socialist Web Site’s latest article, “The New Space Race: Capitalism, Imperialism, and the Promise of ‘Voyager’,” published on 31 October 2025, offers a searing critique of the current wave of space exploration, arguing that it is driven not by scientific curiosity or the collective betterment of humanity but by the profit motives of global capitalists and the geopolitical ambitions of nation‑states. Drawing on a range of sources, the piece lays out how the United States’ new “Voyager 3” program and the corresponding Russian and Chinese initiatives are intertwined with the continuing imperialist dynamics of the 21st century, and how the rhetoric of “space for all” hides a brutal reality of resource exploitation and geopolitical domination.

The “Voyager” Narrative and Its Capitalist Underpinnings

The article opens by summarising the United States’ launch of the “Voyager 3” satellite system, a project promoted as a milestone in humanity’s march to the stars. According to the piece, the program’s stated goals—extending global internet coverage, enabling scientific research, and fostering international cooperation—are in reality a cover for the monetisation of space and a reinforcement of capitalist dominance in new frontier markets. The WSWS writer notes that the funding for “Voyager 3” comes from a coalition of private aerospace firms—SpaceX, Blue Origin, and other venture‑backed companies—whose primary aim is to secure a share of the lucrative satellite‑communications and space‑tourism sectors.

The article cites the launch announcement made by the US National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) in early October, which claimed that the program would “transform global connectivity.” However, the WSWS piece highlights that the real beneficiaries of this transformation are the private investors who will own the satellites and control the data. The “digital colonisation” that the writers warn about is not a new concept; it is the latest chapter in the long history of imperialism, now moving from the seas to the heavens.

The writer also references the United Nations’ recent declaration that the “Outer Space Treaty” remains the core legal framework governing space activities, but points out that the treaty’s weak enforcement mechanisms allow powerful nations and corporations to pursue their interests with little accountability. The article argues that without a global system of regulation, the “voyage” to space will become a new arena for corporate raiding and military expansion.

Russian and Chinese Counter‑Moves: A New Space‑Based Arms Race

Following the US focus, the piece moves to discuss how Russia has launched the “Zvezda” constellation, described as a counter‑measure to the American initiative. The article explains that the Russian program aims to provide secure, low‑cost satellite communication for the armed forces, as well as to extend Russia’s influence over satellite‑based commerce. The WSWS writer points out that this reflects Russia’s continuing strategy of “space as a military platform,” reminiscent of the Cold War era, but now adapted to the 21st‑century geopolitical context.

China’s “Long‑Shan” program is also examined. The article describes China’s efforts to build a dense network of low‑Earth‑orbit satellites that will provide broadband services and military advantages. The writers stress that China’s “soft power” strategy is now underpinned by space assets, allowing it to exert influence on global trade routes, surveillance, and data collection. The piece links to the Chinese Ministry of National Defence’s official statement (https://www.mnd.gov.cn/pressrelease/2025/10/30/20251030.shtml) to show how the government frames the project as “protecting national security and advancing technological development,” but critics argue that the underlying motive is power consolidation.

The Global Impact on Developing Nations

A major section of the article is devoted to the plight of developing countries in the new space age. The WSWS writer argues that while the rhetoric of “space for all” suggests that satellite technology will benefit every nation, in reality it will reinforce global inequalities. Many low‑income countries lack the infrastructure and expertise to participate meaningfully in the space economy, and the global market is increasingly monopolised by a handful of rich nations and corporations. The piece cites the World Bank’s 2025 report on digital infrastructure (https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/digital-infrastructure/publication/2025-report) to demonstrate how the cost of launching and maintaining satellites remains prohibitive for most emerging economies.

The article also touches upon the environmental toll of space launches. The WSWS writer notes that the carbon emissions associated with rocket launches, as well as the space debris created by defunct satellites, pose a threat to the planet’s climate and ecosystems. The piece references the European Space Agency’s (ESA) 2025 debris mitigation guidelines (https://www.esa.int/Enabling_Support/Space_Engineering_Technology/Space_debris) to underline the lack of effective international regulation.

Calls for a Global Cooperative Framework

The article concludes by urging the international community to develop a new cooperative framework for space exploration—one that prioritises humanity’s collective good over individual profits. The writer advocates for a “space commons” that would be governed by a global treaty, ensuring that space resources are used sustainably and equitably. The article suggests that such a framework would involve the participation of non‑governmental organisations, workers’ unions, and civil society groups to hold powerful actors accountable.

The piece is linked to a WSWS editorial from earlier in the year that called for a “Global Space Governance Council” (https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2025/09/space-o30.html), and to an op‑ed by a union leader in the aerospace industry (https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2025/08/union-o28.html) that underscores the need for workers’ rights in the new space economy.

Key Takeaways

1. Capitalist Motives: The “Voyager 3” program and its counterparts are portrayed as a capitalist venture that prioritises profit over public benefit, with private companies at the forefront of space exploitation.
2. Imperialist Dynamics: The article argues that space has become a new battleground for geopolitical dominance, with the US, Russia, and China vying for strategic advantages.
3. Global Inequalities: Developing nations are left behind in the new space economy, exacerbating existing disparities and limiting access to essential technologies.
4. Environmental Concerns: Space launches contribute to climate change and create a growing problem of orbital debris, which is not adequately regulated.
5. Need for Cooperation: The writer calls for a global, democratic governance structure that prioritises equitable access and sustainability.

In a world where the heavens are increasingly commodified, the World Socialist Web Site reminds readers that space is not a free domain but a contested terrain. The article concludes with a powerful statement: “Space will not be a frontier for the few, but a shared future for all – if we collectively choose to make it so.”