Fri, July 25, 2025
Thu, July 24, 2025
Wed, July 23, 2025
Tue, July 22, 2025
Mon, July 21, 2025
[ Last Monday ]: WSAZ
Fitness Challenge Friday

Jillian Michaels wants ''a hell of a lot more banned from our food supply'' to protect Americans

  Copy link into your clipboard //health-fitness.news-articles.net/content/2025/ .. d-from-our-food-supply-to-protect-americans.html
  Print publication without navigation Published in Health and Fitness on by Fox News
          🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source
  Fitness trainer, and entrepreneur Jillian Michaels joined Fox News Digital to discuss her thoughts of the MAHA movement and what else she would like to see reformed.

Jillian Michaels Advocates for Stricter Bans on Harmful Food Additives to Safeguard American Health


In a passionate plea for reform, renowned fitness expert and wellness advocate Jillian Michaels has called for a sweeping overhaul of the ingredients allowed in the U.S. food supply. During a recent appearance on a media platform, Michaels expressed deep frustration with the current regulatory landscape, arguing that far more substances need to be banned to protect Americans from a host of health risks. Her comments come amid growing national conversations about food safety, obesity epidemics, and the long-term impacts of processed foods on public health. Michaels, best known for her no-nonsense approach on shows like "The Biggest Loser," didn't mince words, stating that she wants "a hell of a lot more" removed from shelves to prevent unnecessary harm to consumers, particularly vulnerable populations like children.

Michaels' advocacy centers on the idea that the American food system is riddled with additives, preservatives, and chemicals that are not only unnecessary but actively detrimental. She highlighted recent legislative moves, such as California's groundbreaking ban on certain food dyes and additives commonly found in snacks, cereals, and beverages. This law, which targets substances like Red Dye No. 3, potassium bromate, and others linked to hyperactivity in children and potential carcinogenic effects, serves as a model for what Michaels believes should be a nationwide effort. "If California can do it, why can't the rest of the country?" she questioned, emphasizing that these bans are not about restricting freedom but about ensuring safety. She pointed out that many of these ingredients have already been prohibited in countries across Europe, Canada, and Australia, where stricter regulations prioritize consumer health over corporate profits.

Delving deeper into her concerns, Michaels drew attention to the broader implications of these food additives. She argued that they contribute significantly to America's escalating health crises, including skyrocketing rates of obesity, diabetes, and even certain cancers. For instance, she referenced studies suggesting that artificial colors and flavors can exacerbate attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms in children, leading to behavioral issues that affect learning and family dynamics. "We're poisoning our kids with this junk," Michaels asserted, painting a vivid picture of school lunches filled with brightly colored, chemically enhanced foods that prioritize shelf life and appeal over nutritional value. She also touched on preservatives like BHA and BHT, which are used to prevent spoilage but have been associated with endocrine disruption and other health problems in animal studies. Michaels stressed that while the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) deems many of these safe in small quantities, the cumulative exposure from a diet heavy in processed foods tells a different story.

Expanding on her call for action, Michaels proposed a multi-faceted approach to reforming the food supply. First and foremost, she advocated for expanding bans to include a wider array of synthetic dyes, artificial sweeteners, and trans fats that linger in products despite partial restrictions. She specifically mentioned high-fructose corn syrup, which she described as a "silent killer" fueling the obesity epidemic by hijacking the body's hunger signals and contributing to insulin resistance. Michaels urged lawmakers to look beyond just dyes and consider pesticides and hormones in meat and dairy, which she believes are linked to hormonal imbalances and reproductive health issues. "We need to ban growth hormones in cattle and antibiotics that are overused in farming," she said, linking these practices to antibiotic resistance in humans and environmental degradation.

To bolster her arguments, Michaels shared personal anecdotes from her career in fitness and wellness. Having worked with thousands of individuals struggling with weight and health issues, she recounted stories of clients who saw dramatic improvements simply by eliminating processed foods from their diets. "It's not rocket science," she explained. "When you remove the toxins, the body heals itself." She criticized the food industry for lobbying against regulations, accusing corporations of prioritizing profits over people. Michaels pointed to the influence of big food conglomerates in shaping FDA policies, suggesting that conflicts of interest have allowed harmful substances to remain on the market for decades. She called for greater transparency, such as mandatory labeling of all additives and their potential risks, empowering consumers to make informed choices.

The conversation also touched on the economic aspects of such bans. Michaels acknowledged that critics might argue that removing these ingredients could drive up food prices or limit options, but she countered that the long-term savings in healthcare costs would far outweigh any short-term inconveniences. "Think about the billions we spend on treating preventable diseases," she said. "Banning this stuff is an investment in our future." She praised initiatives like those from organic food advocates and clean-eating movements, which have already shifted consumer demand toward healthier alternatives. Michaels encouraged everyday Americans to get involved by supporting petitions, contacting legislators, and voting with their wallets by choosing brands that avoid controversial additives.

In a broader context, Michaels' stance aligns with a growing chorus of health experts, celebrities, and activists pushing for food system reform. Figures like Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and various nutritionists have echoed similar sentiments, highlighting disparities in food quality between the U.S. and other developed nations. For example, she noted that popular American snacks like certain potato chips or sodas contain ingredients banned in the European Union due to health concerns. This international comparison underscores what Michaels sees as a failure of American oversight, where regulatory bodies like the FDA often rely on industry-funded studies rather than independent research.

Michaels didn't stop at bans; she also emphasized the need for education and prevention. She advocated for school programs that teach children about nutrition, replacing vending machines stocked with sugary treats with fresh fruit options. "We have to start young," she insisted, warning that habits formed in childhood carry into adulthood, perpetuating cycles of poor health. Additionally, she called for more research funding into the effects of food additives, criticizing the current system where many chemicals are "grandfathered in" without rigorous modern testing.

Public reaction to Michaels' comments has been mixed but largely supportive among her fan base. Social media buzzed with agreement from parents concerned about their children's diets, while some industry insiders dismissed her as alarmist. Nonetheless, her message resonates in an era where documentaries like "Food, Inc." and "Fed Up" have exposed the underbelly of the food industry. Michaels wrapped up her discussion by reiterating her core belief: "Health isn't about deprivation; it's about protection. We deserve better than what's currently on our plates."

As debates over food safety intensify, Michaels' call to action serves as a rallying cry for change. Whether through state-level bans like California's or federal overhauls, her vision is clear—a food supply free from unnecessary harms, fostering a healthier nation. With obesity affecting over 40% of American adults and related diseases straining healthcare systems, her words underscore the urgency of reevaluating what we allow into our bodies. By pushing for these bans, Michaels aims not just to protect individuals but to transform the very foundation of American eating habits for generations to come.

(Word count: 1,028)

Read the Full Fox News Article at:
[ https://www.foxnews.com/media/jillian-michaels-wants-a-hell-lot-more-banned-from-our-food-supply-protect-americans ]