Health and Fitness Health and Fitness
Thu, December 1, 2011
Wed, November 30, 2011

Rigrodsky & Long, P.A. Announces a Securities Fraud Class Action Lawsuit Has Been Filed Against The Cooper Companies, Inc.


Published on 2011-11-30 15:26:39 - Market Wire
  Print publication without navigation


WILMINGTON, Del.--([ ])--[ Rigrodsky & Long, P.A. ] announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California on behalf of all persons or entities who purchased or otherwise acquired the stock of The Cooper Companies, Inc. (aCoopera or the aCompanya) (NYSE: [ COO ]) between March 4, 2011 and November 15, 2011, inclusive (the aClass Perioda) alleging violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the aComplainta).

If you wish to discuss this action or have any questions concerning this notice or your rights or interests, please contact [ Timothy J. MacFall, Esquire ] or [ Noah R. Wortman, Case Development Director ] of Rigrodsky & Long, P.A., 919 North Market Street, Suite 980 Wilmington, Delaware, 19801 at (888) 969-4242, by e-mail to [ info@rigrodskylong.com ], or at: [ http://investigations.rigrodskylong.com/cooper-companies-inc-coo/ ].

Cooper, through its subsidiaries, develops, manufactures, and markets healthcare products serving the vision care and womenas healthcare markets worldwide.

The Complaint names Cooper and certain of the Companyas directors and officers as defendants. The Complaint alleges that during the Class Period, defendants made materially false and misleading statements that concealed known quality control problems and process defects at the Companyas new overseas contact lens manufacturing facilities.

Cooperas wholly-owned subsidiary, CooperVision, provides approximately 84% of Cooperas revenue and is the worldas third largest manufacturer of contact lenses. In late 2009, the Companyas contact lens manufacturing facilities were moved from Virginia to plants in Puerto Rico and the United Kingdom. Cooper assured its investors and consumers that the quality of its contact lenses would not suffer as result of the move. During the Class Period, Defendants raised the Companyas guidance three times and several Cooper executives cashed-in tens of thousands of shares of Company stock for millions of dollars.

On August 19, 2011, CooperVision announced a voluntary recall of limited lots of its Avaira Toric contact lenses that were manufactured at the Puerto Rico plant. In October 2011, the United States Food and Drug Administration (aFDAa) stepped in and issued a Class I warning and pressured Cooper to provide clear notice to the public of the reasons behind the recall.

On November 15, 2011, CooperVision announced that it was expanding its worldwide recall of the Avaira brand product line of contact lenses to include a limited number of lots of Avaira Sphere contact lenses, as well.

In response to the foregoing news, Cooperas shares reacted by falling almost 13% from the previous dayas close of $64.95 per share, to close at $56.64 per share on November 15, 2011, on very heavy trading volume.

If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than January 27, 2012. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. In order to be appointed lead plaintiff, the Court must determine that the class memberas claim is typical of the claims of other class members, and that the class member will adequately represent the class. Your ability to share in any recovery is not, however, affected by the decision whether or not to serve as a lead plaintiff. Any member of the proposed class may move the court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member.

While [ Rigrodsky & Long, P.A. ] did not file the Complaint in this matter, the firm, with offices in Wilmington, Delaware and Garden City, New York, [ regularly litigates securities class, derivative and direct actions, shareholder rights litigation and corporate governance litigation ], including claims for breach of fiduciary duty and proxy violations in the Delaware Court of Chancery and in state and federal courts throughout the United States.

Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Contributing Sources