N🟁N

I tried fitness trackers from Apple, Garmin and Fitbit for a month. Here's what I thought

The article discusses a month-long experiment where the author tested fitness trackers from Apple, Garmin, and Fitbit to compare their features, accuracy, and user experience. The Apple Watch Ultra 2 was praised for its seamless integration with the iPhone, offering a wide range of health metrics and a high-quality display, though it was noted for its high cost and battery life concerns. Garmin's Forerunner 265 was highlighted for its superior battery life, accurate GPS tracking, and detailed training insights, making it ideal for serious athletes despite its less intuitive interface. Fitbit's Charge 6 was appreciated for its affordability, comfort, and basic fitness tracking capabilities, although it lacks some of the advanced features found in its competitors. Each device had its strengths: Apple for its ecosystem and smartwatch features, Garmin for sports and training analytics, and Fitbit for simplicity and cost-effectiveness. However, the author concluded that the choice largely depends on individual needs, preferences for smartwatch features versus fitness tracking, and budget considerations.

Read the Full MSN Article at:
[ https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/fitness-and-exercise/i-tried-fitness-trackers-from-apple-garmin-and-fitbit-for-a-month-here-s-what-i-thought/ar-AA1xckwq ]